Critiques pour Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context par Wikiwand
Avis de Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14234915 de Firefox
Noté 4 sur 5
par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14234915 de Firefox, il y a 6 ansWikipedia can change its appearance nowadays although it's a bit tricky.
You need to create a profile and change the appearance to "Minerva".
You need to create a profile and change the appearance to "Minerva".
671 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par Haltarys, il y a 10 joursThe extension used to be good but now they're pushing users to subscribe, don't follow dark mode by default anymore (it resets every couple of days or so), and push the AI tab too much.
(And apparently, it has way too much ads, which I don't see because I use an ad blocker anyway) - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19053100 de Firefox, il y a 23 joursUsed to be really good, now it's infested with ads (ON A WIKIPEDIA SKIN, a notably ad free site) and AI bullshit everywhere, asking for a subscription. It also automatically blocks access to actual wikipedia, by automatically rerouting every article to their skin of it. No even entering the wikipedia website manually can you there with this extension installed. Where can i just get this extension, but how it was 2 or 3 years ago?
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19391462 de Firefox, il y a un moiswas a good addon until constant ai ads
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19114790 de Firefox, il y a 2 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Sciky, il y a 2 moisThis used to be a great extension, but now it's a bloatware full of ads for its AI, what a shame
- Noté 1 sur 5par Indiana Moon, il y a 3 moisIt does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19063414 de Firefox, il y a 3 moisWikiwand was great, but now it's infested with AI popups, ads and the constant bugging to make an account. A shame because it used to be a great tool, now it's more work to click all the nonsense away.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Wamida, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par carl, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14503325 de Firefox, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19040033 de Firefox, il y a 4 moisUsed to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14706773 de Firefox, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Ally Simy, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 19035698 de Firefox, il y a 4 moisEnshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- Noté 1 sur 5par LCM, il y a 4 moisThey had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17979558 de Firefox, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Milan Regec, il y a 4 moisAll it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18996590 de Firefox, il y a 4 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Toccetness, il y a 4 moisAd-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17669402 de Firefox, il y a 5 moisAs many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- Noté 5 sur 5par marii, il y a 5 mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17852983 de Firefox, il y a 5 mois