Critiques pour Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context par Wikiwand
671 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14528042 de Firefox, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Seän "Frostbyte" Shepherd, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13917435 de Firefox, il y a un anIt used to be very good. I am sorry to say but the actual Wikipedia website offers a cleaner, and better experience than this riddled with unnecessary feature(s) add-on.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Parakeet709, il y a un anSwitched to another extension after all these AI features rolled out. Just wanted to change the look of articles, but now I can't even do that because its bundled with the paid AI features. If you're looking for a modern and sleek way to make Wikipedia look nice, either get Dark Reader, which lets you keep the default design but make it dark mode, or Modern for Wikipedia, which makes it look nicer, lets you change between shades from white to black and a light brown, and lastly lets you adjust stuff with the text.
I was not sponsored to say this, by the way, this is just my own opinion. I love the style of Wikiwand, but the AI features being forced on causing other design features to be behind a paywall caused me to list alternatives for people reading this. - Noté 5 sur 5par Mouad, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18666384 de Firefox, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Gigatron, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18655778 de Firefox, il y a un anUsed to be good, now just full of premium pop-ups, AI, and selling user data.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13885454 de Firefox, il y a un anBring back the Pre-AI version... New version is garbage... Have opted for a different extension
- Noté 2 sur 5par blackrose, il y a un anIt used to be good before they started shoving their premium AI tools down your throat. Better to just use Wikipedia at this point
- Noté 1 sur 5par Pierson Moore, il y a un anThis extension has become unusable. I don't want to sign in to save my formatting settings, it takes 4 clicks to get rid of the stupid popup and then you also have to clear the AI popup. I really don't care if Wikiwand has AI in it or not but stop shoving it down our throats. set it off to the corner of the page and don't open the AI chat/summary until the user requests it.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 6186021 de Firefox, il y a un anI was deeply impressed by perfect German and "knowledge". My question was very specific. I was not able to find any information by myself (google, wiki, an so on). So I said to myself: let's ask Wikiwand. The rest you know. WOW.
I will recommend Wikiwand to all my friends. - Noté 1 sur 5par Mtro, il y a un anUsed to be a very nice wikipedia skin. But like so many things, it's been turned into a business that adds all kind of things I don't want--especially AI. I'll just go back to regular wikipedia.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18641858 de Firefox, il y a un anI loved Wikiwand for years but the AI stuff is just too much. I don't want AI to dumb down a Wikipedia article for me, I can read just fine thanks! The rest of your features are not worth the headache of popups begging me to use AI so I'll pay for more functionality. Uninstalling!
- Noté 1 sur 5par aszl, il y a un an
- Noté 2 sur 5par Fuseteam, il y a un anPlease let me opt-out the ai slop, i do not want to log in for ai features and i'd to like say that **once**, not every time i visit wikipedia
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15046301 de Firefox, il y a un anWere the new AI features worth losing thousands of users? Your job is to pretty up wikipedia, not nagging me every time to login and use AI features. Bye bye.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Cobra, il y a un anUsed to be a great way of reading Wikipedia with much nicer visuals. I've used it for *years*. Now it has useless AI barf all over it and a bunch of things behind a paywall. Sorry, but I'm out. Modern for Wikipedia is a much nicer alternative.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18625533 de Firefox, il y a un anUsed to be lightweight and unobtrusive. Bloated with unnecessary AI features now.
- Noté 5 sur 5par JaroMo, il y a un an
- Noté 1 sur 5par Sebi, il y a un anIt used to be a really great extension that made Wikipedia much nicer. And then a "genius" came up with the idea of integrating AI - and monetization at every turn. A great reading experience becomes a supermarket advertisement. Horrible. Everything ruined after so many years.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 17871572 de Firefox, il y a un anWhat a great addon it was! One of my essentials. 5/5 for like, years. You can **** off with this AI *** though. Not even gonna install it ever again, seeing if something has changed. You're done. 1/5, never recommending it to my friends, never trying it again. You've had one "job".... Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Also, Wiki has a dark mode now. This is all some of us needed. Thanks for ******* it up.