Critiques pour Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context par Wikiwand
671 notes
- Noté 2 sur 5par sdf64, il y a 2 ansThe updated view is difficult to navigate, uses blurry images as backgrounds, and doesn't support navigating through talk pages for editors. The way it's designed is for readability without integrating other functionalities as it doesn't use CSS themes but rather a URL with back-end to process Wikipedia articles - which may contribute to lag.
- Noté 5 sur 5par omer, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14107720 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14561823 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans長年お世話になりましたが、オリジナルWikipediaの使い勝手向上とWikiwandの使いにくい進化のために利用を中止しました。
使い始めた当時、サイドバー式の固定された目次に最も価値を感じていましたが、現在はやや使いにくいもののオリジナルにも搭載されました。
無意味なフローティング効果、広い空白などの見づらいデザインになった事もマイナスですが、Ctrl+クリックで新しいタブでリンクを開けなくなった事は致命的でした。
尚、元々IMEを使用して入力する言語はしっかりとサポートしておらず、検索フォームが上手く動作しない問題を抱えていて、これは改善されていません。 - Noté 5 sur 5par Time_Seer, il y a 2 ansThis add-on enhances the Wikipedia experience with an improved visual interface. Once I started using it, I realize that it's the only way to fully appreciate Wikipedia and what it has to offer
- Noté 1 sur 5par phat_sumo, il y a 2 ansWikiwand's styling is great, but I wish they were more transparent about the data they collect from users. Additionally, ctrl+click constantly breaks and opens links in the same tab, which is infuriating. I wish that basic functionality like this worked consistently.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Dr JOHNBOSCO KISIMBII, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 15004423 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par kind0fmagic, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14900668 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Ivan, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par anothertemple, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Matyi, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Harsha, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par OlavWolfiken, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Pilar Rodriguez Aranda, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par syrthio, il y a 2 ansit's... pretty to look at and read, but that's about it. I was excited to find this, but grew increasingly disappointed. most articles I personally read do not have images large enough attached to the article to not get extremely distorted by the otherwise-nice-looking banner Wikiwand generates, and customization is pretty basic (and no longer matches the screenshots here, unless I'm missing something). I was also not pleased with yet more shoving of AI down my throat. it took three or four times switching it off before it stopped popping up. the deal-breaker for me, though, is the loss of the hover preview for Wikilinks -- apparently, they're supposed to work, but never did for me and I get distracted enough as-is without having to open an entirely new page/tab just to see what the article is about. ultimately, user styles for vanilla Wikipedia serve my needs better.
- Noté 5 sur 5par oThi, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par adriaslb, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 3 sur 5par pulsar14, il y a 2 ansVery good Layout but ... audio reading should be fixed. 1st the reading velocity is not the one set in windows speech; 2nd, the voice type always reset to the 1st available in the list. E.g. If I choose Susan as my preferred ENG voice, why do I have to re-set Susan voice every time I want to listen instead of David (the 1st in the voices list)? 3rd, the reading voice should start from the top row visible on the screen, not at start of the entire doc.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16066501 de Firefox, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Luracasmus, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Alexander Mosquera, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Shalom, il y a 2 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Anthony-S6, il y a 2 ans