Critiques pour Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context par Wikiwand
671 notes
- Noté 1 sur 5par Kioraga, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Aphotic, il y a 9 moisnow its filled with ads, 1 star.
alternative addon:
Modern for Wikipedia
by Modern Redesigns - Noté 2 sur 5par Schorle, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 16073868 de Firefox, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18749240 de Firefox, il y a 9 moisWikiwand used to be great. It was a bit annoying when the AI features were shoved in my face, but it was at least tolerable. However, ads have been added recently, and even if I use an ad blocker there are still placeholders breaking the page layout.
RIP Wikiwand. - Noté 1 sur 5par Mikaïl, il y a 9 moisThe AI features are useless, used it once and didn't even answer my question, might as well use ChatGPT for AI
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14961228 de Firefox, il y a 9 moisToo much ads and AI-slop
- Noté 5 sur 5par OzMerry, il y a 9 moisSo, I wrote a negative review yesterday (which I've now deleted), but it appears that the Wikiwand add-on was updated yesterday and it's now working again. Yay! The AI Tools block on the right can be minimised and an ad blocker takes care of ads, but I may just upgrade to a paid version anyway since I use Wikipedia a lot and WIkiwand (pro) is very reasonably priced and supports the existing and ongoing development efforts of a great add-on. FWIW, I think it's worth it to get a much better reading experience than ordinary Wikipedia for frequent users.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Richard Yan, il y a 9 moisUsed to be great with beautiful styles. When the AI stuff rolled out, I felt like it was bad taste but stuck with it. Then came the ads, on top of hard work by volunteers editing wikipedia. I guess we do live in a capitalist society with insatiable corporate greed, but the least I could do is to stop using this expired plugin. Oh and also, no, some lines of CSS is not worth $5 a month.
- Noté 2 sur 5par Tamm Horsfall, il y a 9 moisPutting ads and AI-slop on a free to use webpage is peak greed, well done. You are a shadow of your former self.
- Noté 1 sur 5par linuxenjoyer, il y a 9 moisIt was good for a while but they added AI stuff nobody asked for and you now have to be logged into their system for data collection if you don't want to get served ads.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Nick, il y a 9 moisI'll stick with Wiki's default look if it means no ads, no random AI stuff, etc. Have been a user for some time, but I guess all good things must come to an end.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18744013 de Firefox, il y a 9 moisI've used this extension for quite some time and it used to work flawlessly. As of recent updates Wikiwand started to inject advertisements into Wikipedia pages even though Wikipedia, by principles, is free from ads. It's absolutely unacceptable.
- Noté 1 sur 5par AP6YC, il y a 9 moisWikiwand is absolute trash now. Nonsense AI tools are pushed nonstop, and ads are inserted in so many places in the page. What a waste of what was once a great tool. Go somewhere else to format Wiki pages.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18743018 de Firefox, il y a 9 moisStarted as a fantastic skin/custom CSS for wikipedia. Now turned into some sort of weird corporate product pushing AI summaries and an ungodly amount of ads! Ads on wikipedia??? Have you gone insane?
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18229951 de Firefox, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18725086 de Firefox, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par rey, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Xen, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Joey, il y a 10 moisDoes not enhance the user experience of Wikipedia at all. Instead, it changes the look slightly and then bombards you with pop-ups trying to get you to buy their AI service whenever you try to read an article.