Wikiwand - knowledge, with context 的評論
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context 作者: Wikiwand
141 筆評論
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17984040,9 個月前Shoves GenAI garbage down your throat and the pop ups blocks half the screen. Also sells your data. Just go use something like Modern for Wikipedia
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14774990,9 個月前Great design, but ruined by first having AI shoved in my face and now ads everywhere. Back to classic Wikipedia.
- Was great, but the recent changes made the UI awful and turn this add-on into a whole cash cow that is against the principles of Wikipedia
- Too much ads, trying to hide bring to a paywall, adding CSS doesn't worth 5$. Even with an adblock the banner background stays.
- They added an AI that is completely useless and only here to surf on the trend of AIs.
- Talking about ads it requires a Wikimand account despite that Wikipedia already have one
We can't accept an add-on that makes money off Wikipedia - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18160256,9 個月前Was once good, now it is terrible and full of ads.
The ads can be blocked with an ad-blocker but it will leave placeholder boxes. If you're using ublock Origin, you can remove them with the "block Element function" though you will need to tune it to remove them entirely.
Target the 'remove ads' part, and tune the left slider once to the left. Preview shows the results in real-time. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18749240,9 個月前Wikiwand used to be great. It was a bit annoying when the AI features were shoved in my face, but it was at least tolerable. However, ads have been added recently, and even if I use an ad blocker there are still placeholders breaking the page layout.
RIP Wikiwand. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Richard Yan,9 個月前Used to be great with beautiful styles. When the AI stuff rolled out, I felt like it was bad taste but stuck with it. Then came the ads, on top of hard work by volunteers editing wikipedia. I guess we do live in a capitalist society with insatiable corporate greed, but the least I could do is to stop using this expired plugin. Oh and also, no, some lines of CSS is not worth $5 a month.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 linuxenjoyer,9 個月前It was good for a while but they added AI stuff nobody asked for and you now have to be logged into their system for data collection if you don't want to get served ads.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18744013,9 個月前I've used this extension for quite some time and it used to work flawlessly. As of recent updates Wikiwand started to inject advertisements into Wikipedia pages even though Wikipedia, by principles, is free from ads. It's absolutely unacceptable.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18743018,9 個月前Started as a fantastic skin/custom CSS for wikipedia. Now turned into some sort of weird corporate product pushing AI summaries and an ungodly amount of ads! Ads on wikipedia??? Have you gone insane?
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18725086,10 個月前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Parakeet709,1 年前Switched to another extension after all these AI features rolled out. Just wanted to change the look of articles, but now I can't even do that because its bundled with the paid AI features. If you're looking for a modern and sleek way to make Wikipedia look nice, either get Dark Reader, which lets you keep the default design but make it dark mode, or Modern for Wikipedia, which makes it look nicer, lets you change between shades from white to black and a light brown, and lastly lets you adjust stuff with the text.
I was not sponsored to say this, by the way, this is just my own opinion. I love the style of Wikiwand, but the AI features being forced on causing other design features to be behind a paywall caused me to list alternatives for people reading this.