Wikiwand - knowledge, with context 的評論
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context 作者: Wikiwand
141 筆評論
- The extension used to be good but now they're pushing users to subscribe, don't follow dark mode by default anymore (it resets every couple of days or so), and push the AI tab too much.
(And apparently, it has way too much ads, which I don't see because I use an ad blocker anyway) - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 19053100,23 天前Used to be really good, now it's infested with ads (ON A WIKIPEDIA SKIN, a notably ad free site) and AI bullshit everywhere, asking for a subscription. It also automatically blocks access to actual wikipedia, by automatically rerouting every article to their skin of it. No even entering the wikipedia website manually can you there with this extension installed. Where can i just get this extension, but how it was 2 or 3 years ago?
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Indiana Moon,3 個月前It does not "enhance user experience" as stated in the add-on description section. It was good once.
Enshittification! - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14503325,4 個月前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 19040033,4 個月前Used to be a great addon but now totally destroyed by the Ads and AI
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 19035698,4 個月前Enshittification everywhere. Was a very nice plugin to cleanly read wikipedia, now cluttered with AI and ads
- They had the nerve to actually BLOCK people from accessing entire wikipedia pages. You are required to watch an ad before you can access the page. This is allegedly to have access to their "wikicontent," which is not needed or desired. This app used to be good. But pulling this crap was a step too far. You CANNOT BLOCK ACCESS TO WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE MONEY FROM ADS.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Milan Regec,4 個月前All it does now is infest your Wikipedia with ads. Don't bother installing and I highly recommend uninstalling it if you already did so. Even when uninstalled, it keeps coming back and keeps stealing all Wikipedia links.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18996590,4 個月前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Toccetness,4 個月前Ad-required, AI-driven slop. Went from premiere readability to money-driven corporation. Do not install.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17669402,5 個月前As many other reviews say. initially a good idea, now, full of AI slop i don't want.
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 12661639,6 個月前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17046154,7 個月前Used to be a solid add-on, but now pesters the user to login for "AI tools" every time a Wikipedia link is visited, causing unnecessary bloat and wasting the user's time. Why they absolutely ruined a good add-on is beyond me.
- If I want AI, I'll either build my own local solution with whatever LLM I want for free or go to a website or use a separate app. Wikiwands' entire existence for being is to make the Wikipedia layout easier to read. Nothing else. Don't remake it ever. AI Wand, NOT Wikiwand. Utter JUNK made by JUNK developers, supported by JUNK people.
- This used to be a good extension, which I used for many years across different browsers and devices. Today I've had enough and I'm going to uninstall it.
Before they started remaking it, it was very good. It was essentially a better layout for Wikipedia with not much else to it, but that's why I liked it. It made it clearer to read, easier to use, and just overall felt like a more updated version of Wikipedia's UI. Combined with an ad blocker, it was perfect. However, since the remake, it is worthless. It is so bloated. The majority of the page is taken up with AI stuff, and it wants you to use it constantly. It has made the layout even more confusing - while before I felt like it was very intuitive and more Wikipedia like, now it's just added so much more junk and confusing elements. Wikipedia is way easier to use.
With this latest update, I'm done. I was already getting frustrated with the way pictures were handled. If you clicked on it, there would be various bits of information that covered over part of the picture. Then there was so much blackspace that it wasn't always that much more visible than in the article. You zoom in and it's barely better. Now, I tried to look at the picture it used for the cover image, which no longer shows up in the sidebar as well. I clicked on it, and it was much the same as it used to be, although the information/other pictures below now fades away. Good! However I tried zooming in, because it was still not a big picture. It not only barely zoomed in, but moved the maybe two pixels bigger image around with my cursor. So now I had a very vaguely enlarged picture of some people that bounced around as I tried to exit out of it. Cool!!!!!! Good thing I never use Wikipedia to look at things like art as someone who enjoys art history!!!
The AI is too much, the paywall is too much, the needing to have a separate account for it is too much. And now they have continued to just make the UI worse and worse. I'm done here. I'm so sad that this has gone this way. I'm so disappointed. They had something good and it's useless now. I'd rather use normal Wikipedia, and that's the first time I've said that in many years. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17490856,8 個月前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17143382,9 個月前