Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 的評論
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 作者: LanguageTooler GmbH
157 筆評論
開發者回應
張貼於 1 年前Please send us more detailed feedback on the forum at https://forum.languagetool.org/. Generally, the language detection should work well once it has enough text (>15 characters or so).- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18474298,1 年前
- I guess it's useful if you're terrible at writing, and it's helped me fix a couple minor errors, but overall this tool is terrible. It recommends putting commas everywhere you could possibly think of, misses a ton of grammatical errors, and is generally not useful. The thing that drove me over the edge was when it would recognize "Dursley" and "Dursley's", but would correct "Dursleys" back to "Dursley's".
It's more of a nuisance than a help. 開發者回應
張貼於 1 年前That's not quite correct. European Portuguese is available for spelling and grammar checking, but not for paraphrasing.- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Overflow8471,1 年前It is sad that the add-on is no longer open source and does not make transparent what is read and transmitted to the server. Complete regression.
開發者回應
張貼於 1 年前Our privacy policy at https://addons.vaultpit.io/en-US/firefox/addon/languagetool/privacy/ describes what is transferred to the servers. This is also linked in the add-on description and in the onboarding process during installation. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Myrtle Dunbar,2 年前
- I'm so sad this add-on isn't working anymore. I've used this for over a year and it was incredible, even without accessing the paid tools. Today I starting working as usual, correcting some papers, and I saw the tool didn't catch very simple mistakes (one of the sentences was "I cook burger and pizza"). IDK what happened, but I'll be deleting the extention for now.
開發者回應
張貼於 2 年前We haven't changed the error detection logic recently. However, it's possible that some errors are not detected, but we're constantly improving the system. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14493762,2 年前Perfect!
If you like all the text you write sent to advertisers and shady third parties.
Just take a look at their privacy policy, easily the creepiest extension I've come across so far.
Can't understand how it's still in the "Recommended" section. Mozilla WTAF.開發者回應
張貼於 2 年前You're probably confusing the add-on and the website. On the website, we use several common tools that almost everybody else uses, e.g. Google Analytics. You're of course free to call that "shady". The add-on doesn't use Google Analytics, and I'm not sure what you refer to as "shady third parties". - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Ron Gillis,2 年前I was not able to select British English, as used in Canada. Many different spellings.
開發者回應
張貼於 2 年前Could you please contact our support and describe the details of the issue? We're not aware of any problems with switching the language variant. You can find the support email address at https://languagetool.org/legal/ - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18220567,2 年前
- Module complétement ridicule, ne connait même pas l'orthographe française, et quand on essaye d'utiliser la prétendue "intelligence artificielle" on obtient des phrases complètement tordues qui ne veulent rien dire. Parfaitement à l'image de tout système "d'intelligence artificielle", écrit des contre-sens, ne respecte pas les règles grammaticales, nul ! A éviter à tout prix.
開發者回應
張貼於 2 年前Could you provide some specific examples that don't work? We have many happy users who use LanguageTool for French. - 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16471004,2 年前
開發者回應
張貼於 2 年前Sorry you're experiencing issues. Could you send an email to our support with a more detailed description? You can find the email address at https://languagetool.org/legal.