Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 的評論
Grammar and Spell Checker - LanguageTool 作者: LanguageTooler GmbH
4,617 筆評論
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 17202347,10 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18709693,10 個月前
- 評價 1 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18705595,10 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Digital TV Media,10 個月前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 16283084,10 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18703844,10 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 9989226,10 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 stefansoyka,10 個月前Viel besser als alles, was ich vorher ausprobiert habe. Eine echte Hilfe, die auch Casus, Numerus und Genus von abhängigen Worten prüft. Ist auch in LibreOffice eine schöne Ergänzung, wenn man mal offline schreibt.
- 評價 2 分,滿分 5 分來自 Endless Fantasy,10 個月前Two stars for not including an option to select, an “Any dialect” in the which dialect to use dropdown, or select multiple as a bubble, as either a basic or advanced option.
I consider this a critical feature of any language tool, especially a spell check.
I'd also like to be able to select “Show both as a suggestion” For these features of premium let alone recommend it as a user I want more freedom of expression in how I type, sometimes to type in standard “wrong” variations and even recommend them (The horror!!!):
Wrong Punctuation
Incorrect Word Combinations
Advanced Missing Commas
Foreign Terms
It's also lacking several important features such as custom dictionaries from what I can tell.
There's no excuse for not loading from standard formats for this.
Review was edited using this software.
The software also disguises telling you about "Advanced" errors, as a form of very blatant advertisement, and front-loads its AI paraphrasing, and rewriting system as much as it reasonably can without impacting the user experience.
As a user I don't want this, I don't want to know if I made an advanced spelling mistake, because I know that The software does not support that because I read the page, I expect no scanning, not ad's for scanning disguised as good faith showcasing of your product, or the user's failures.
It needs to be a default off option like "Enable scanning of user text for premium features, to warn user about their mistakes" would be ideal.
There's not even any options clutter yet, good work, but its not configurable enough.
Id say my review rating is: Stalker HoC's reception. - 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 18697898,10 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Heinz-Peter Katlewski,10 個月前
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Max Willer,10 個月前
- 評價 4 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14487727,10 個月前I have ProWritingAid Premium, which supposedly gives me the capabilities of this Add-on but I turned it off--will use it for large volume writing and editing--and bought the Pro version of LT instead for everyday use. It is really efficient on PC resources! That is a big deal for me. Apps that cause my PC to buffer or hang up kill my flow and productivity. I wished LT Pro had a writing level complexity rating, a la Hemingway Editor. The annual fee is not cheap either. My Lifetime PWA Premium license is a vastly superior deal. However, for efficient writing assistance and supervision, as you go, this is showing itself to be a standout tool.
- 評價 5 分,滿分 5 分來自 Firefox 使用者 14053445,10 個月前