Recensioner för NoScript Security Suite
NoScript Security Suite av Giorgio Maone
Recension av Jerry Joseph
Betygsatt 5 av 5
av Jerry Joseph, för 2 år sedan2 401 recensioner
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19469020, för 2 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 14500718, för 4 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19459487, för 5 dagar sedanI'm notified every time WebGL is blocked on each page load. There's no way to disable these notifications and it's very irritating.
Edit: updated to 5 stars as it can be disabled after all but the setting isn't described very clearly.Utvecklarens svar
postad för 5 dagar sedanYou should not get any notification. Just a little placeholder inside the page, to be able to enable it back. And you can disable it by unchecking "NoScript Options>Appearance>Show synthetic placeholders for invisible capability probes" - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Cello, för 11 dagar sedanit's 5-stars, because it's little time and effort to manage and also Edward Snowden said that noscript is the best protection in the whole internet...(after some Firefox update, noscript does seem to block internet in Firefox,,, but I'm sure there will be a workaround in the next edition ... buona vacanza)
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Firefox-användare 19223232, för 14 dagar sedanok its a good security 4 ur browser but now the web is so slow that i cant even play a game on poki 💀💀
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Tony Klaus, för 16 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19311874, för 19 dagar sedan
- Betygsatt 2 av 5av Michael Rabinovsky, för 25 dagar sedanNo Script is an incredibly useful add-on. In the past, I'd have given it five stars; it now gets only two (see issues below). All in all, I'd say it's still better to have it than not, but that's only because there is no better alternative, and there is no difference between having to completely disable it on a page versus not having it at all.
First of all, it would have gotten three due to the issues I list further down, but it gets two because of a major functionality problem that makes it obnoxious to use, and by its admission, not private in private windows.
In the past, when you set it to trust top-level domains, it would automatically set them to temp trusted; however, for whatever reason, it now sets them to "custom," for me, which functions the same as untrusted, and changing it doesn't even refresh the page for you.
The default setting handling is a huge inconvenience, but that is not where the problems end. You cannot restore previous functionality by manually setting the top-level domain to temp trust. To enable scripts on the page, you must set it to trust, which makes it permanently trusted, and keeps a log of every page you visit in private windows. If you try to change it to temp trust and refresh the page, it goes back to "custom."
Besides that, the description for the extension is outdated. Not only does it still mention Flash, but it also claims no loss of functionality when you need it, which is not true. In most cases, enabling some scripts will return the functionality you need, but there are several reasons why that's not always the case.
Sometimes, certain scripts you need will be on sub-domains of the top-level domain, and they need to be enabled separately; however, NoScript doesn't show them because it thinks they are part of the main domain, so you have no way to make the site work without completely disabling the addon for the page.
In other instances, sites won't load all the scripts until they load some other domains. For example, a CDN containing vital scripts might not appear on the list because it's called after an analytics script has run. There is no way to know that unless you enable each script on the list, one by one. The domain doesn't need to be related; it's just something about how the page loads. - Betygsatt 1 av 5av Angel, för en månad sedanEsta vaina debería tener un modo automático para aquellos que no saben de programación.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av whatever, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av HunterMirror, för en månad sedanHe notado en las demás reseñas, que las personas no parecen comprender el propósito de este addon. La idea es que bloquee los scripts, si una página se rompe por ello, es algo perfectamente esperable, no es culpa de la extensión perse, sino de quien desarrolló dicha página web, queda a tu criterio si lo quieres añadir a la lista blanca o no. Lo realmente triste y reprochable, es más bien que hoy en día hayan tantas páginas que quieran que actives los scripts si o si para poder usarlos, incluso páginas que no los necesitan para nada.
El abuso de los scripts y la manía de convertir las páginas web en "aplicaciones", es lo que ha causado que ahora usar el navegador implique un consumo cada vez mayor de RAM, sin contar los riesgos de seguridad innecesarios del uso de scripts, tanto para el usuario como para el webmaster/desarrollador. Así que por mi parte, prefiero que se rompan las páginas que sean, no les voy a activar los scripts si no son páginas que hagan un uso inteligente y justo de ellas. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av k4mmi, för en månad sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19265671, för en månad sedanIt give me the power to control every script on every sites.
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 18710229, för en månad sedanThis add-on works as intended and has saved me from a lot of potential problems and annoying website antics.
- Betygsatt 3 av 5av Air, för 2 månader sedanVery useful on a computer, however, enabling it by default on a mobile phone will block many important features, including but not limited to any AI features and video browsing
- Betygsatt 2 av 5av Firefox-användare 19157064, för 2 månader sedanCompletely breaks reddit on mobile, site becomes unusable. I only got it for help blocking reddits creepy tracking bs on this browser.
- Betygsatt 1 av 5av Cory Sanin, för 2 månader sedanOne star for SidebarUtil.tab.js
Disruptive as hell and for what? Why do you need to know if I have a sidebar open? I don't even know what a sidebar is. Remove this nonsense. - Betygsatt 5 av 5av Firefox-användare 19145735, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av And?, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av A Tea Daze, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av srzlt, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av jordan9543, för 2 månader sedan
- Betygsatt 5 av 5av vit55555, för 2 månader sedan