Análises de Disconnect
Disconnect por Disconnect
519 análises
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Imp Mischievous, há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 13832816 do Firefox, há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Wellington Torrejais da Silva, há 8 anosGood Idea and good job, nice interface!
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 13801775 do Firefox, há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por lukasz wasylewicz, há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 11640498 do Firefox, há 8 anosThe "content" option should be blocked by default!
If an user found that it breaks websites, then he might have the option to unblock "content".
It is a shame to force all users to behave as soft-users. You are downgrading users to the same low level.
Also, if you don't block "content" by default, then why do you count "content" as blocked?
It should not appear at the counter in the icon.
It is a shame (if not a scum) to do that.
And worst, if an user blocks "content", why the add-on doesn't remember/respect user' choice after browser restarting?
Why users must block same "content" at every session?
... just crazy!... so mediocre!
And you are hearing from us users, the same complains every year... and nothing, zero changes, zero improvements.
You deserve zero stars due to your blindness along so many years. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Damrongrit Klangthanu, há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 13570215 do Firefox, há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 13666733 do Firefox, há 8 anosThe license for this add-on is falsely stated here as GNU GPL 3.0. This add-on in fact also includes two proprietary (non-free, not open source) third-party software products, as stated on the add-on's github page (https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect). Claiming that the add-on is free software and licensed exclusively under GNU GPL 3.0 is highly deceptive, dishonest and inaccurate. Please rectify this and include the licenses of all software parts of the add-on on its official Mozilla Firefox add-ons page.
I've now reported this issue to the authors, to [email protected], via the form on its AMO page and on Mozilla's forum (https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/information-about-add-on-stated-incorrectly-by-authors-on-amo/23377). All with no effect, the mistake remains. Apparently any add-on developer can just claim anything they want about their add-on, there is no control. It's good to be aware that addons.vaultpit.io can't be trusted and doesn't really care to provide accurate information about add-ons. - Avaliado em 5 de 5por Usuário 12315658 do Firefox, há 8 anosvery very thanks for this plugin. that's awesome.please upgrade to be better. thank you
- Avaliado em 4 de 5por Usuário 12933059 do Firefox, há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 1 de 5por Usuário 13605184 do Firefox, há 8 anos
- Avaliado em 5 de 5por NightlyBlazer, há 8 anos
- This blocks embedded Twitter images from showing on many web pages, such as on Huffington Post pages. And there is no option to change that, other than disabling Disconnect. And I am not sure this addon is needed anymore since Adblock Plus also has options to block tracking. And their options don't block embedded Twitter images from showing on pages.