Recensioni per SingleFile
SingleFile di gildas
982 recensioni
- Valutata 5 su 5di Roberto Casarini, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 15760230, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 4 su 5di Utente Firefox 13048311, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Radu Bogoevici, 5 anni fa
Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 5 anni faThank you. You can update the hidden option "filenameMaxLength" for that. See https://github.com/gildas-lormeau/SingleFile/wiki/Hidden-options for more info about how to change hidden options. Feel free to contact me if you need help.- Valutata 5 su 5di dinor studio, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 1 su 5di NocedaCloud, 5 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di fuzzydorito, 6 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di JavirtanLabs, 6 anni faI used to love the MAFF file format old add-on. I've been missing it till now. Your add-on works pretty well for me. The extra feature for editing (like highlighting) is way too cool. Thanks a lot!
My only question is, how much is this one better than SingleFileZ? I'm curious about that, I mean, why should I use SingleFile instead of SingleFileZ?
EDIT March/11/2020:
The Developer response to my question was pretty clear. Now I understand the differences very well. Thanks a lot for your answer and awesome work!Replica dello sviluppatore
pubblicato il 6 anni faThank you for the review. I would say that the main advantage of SingleFile over SingleFileZ is that pages saved with SingleFile do not require JavaScript to be enabled in order to be displayed. In other words, if you want to save your pages as "pure" HTML files, use SingleFile. If you prefer to save them as zip files disguised as HTML pages, use SingleFileZ.
Note that SingleFile allows you to edit the page with the editor you refer to (I'm glad you like it). SingleFileZ cannot do this because it is more complicated to implement.
EDIT: Thank you! - Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 13870051, 6 anni fa
- Valutata 3 su 5di triantafillia, 6 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Utente Firefox 14738141, 6 anni fa
- Valutata 5 su 5di Idan Nabara, 6 anni fa