Ulasan untuk WebScrapBook
WebScrapBook oleh Danny Lin
Tinjauan oleh 14802265
Diberi peringkat 2 dari 5
oleh 14802265, 6 tahun yang laluI tried this app to save webpages completely and accurately. It works on some pages like ghacks.net perfectly with scripted single html . On other pages like nytimes.com it captures the page out of sync even though all of the content seems to be there (large gap spaces, enlarged photos, etc.) Save Page WE has the same issue. On Washingtonpost.com WebScrapbook was almost perfect but there is a bug that will add incorrect characters if there is an apostrophe in the text(which in a news article there will undoubtedly be). I used scripted single html option on this also. I do have specific scripts for the Times and WPost running, but they are not the issue since Mozilla Archive Format and SingleFile always works perfectly on the same sites with the same scripts running. But since MAF doesnt work for current browsers and SingleFile works somewhat inconsistently (it stalls a lot), I was hoping WebScrapbook would work but no go.
Also, I havent seen an option to save the original page url either in the title or in the .html file for reference like MAF, Singlefile, or SavePage WE can.
I noticed the saved webpage nytimes.com icon was used in the tab, but Webscrapbook couldnt find the icon for washingtonpost.com tab. If the developer wants to see the output files, just tell me where to forward them.
This app might be able to save websites but if it cant do it accurately what's the point of using it.
Also, I havent seen an option to save the original page url either in the title or in the .html file for reference like MAF, Singlefile, or SavePage WE can.
I noticed the saved webpage nytimes.com icon was used in the tab, but Webscrapbook couldnt find the icon for washingtonpost.com tab. If the developer wants to see the output files, just tell me where to forward them.
This app might be able to save websites but if it cant do it accurately what's the point of using it.
Balasan pengembang
dikirim 6 tahun yang laluThank you for the feedback.
The issue on nytimes.com is same as the one with styled components and we are working on it (https://github.com/danny0838/webscrapbook/issues/109). It's a complicated issue as there are many things behind the scene to deal with. We almost have the solution but still need sometime to implement it, maybe next one or two revision.
I can't see an issue for washingtonpost.com, maybe it's really related with the scripts you've mentioned. Could you confirm it (by disabling your scripts and see if the issue's still there) and provide the scripts you are using, for further investigation?
The source page URL is recorded in the source code of the saved page but not shown directly. You'll be able to see it from the metadata if the backend server is used; otherwise you can see it from the source code. We are still investigating an appropriate way to present such metadata without altering the document too explictly.
As this addon site doesn't allow discussion, you can report issues to the source code repo (like the link provided above) so that we can discuss and trace them better:)
The issue on nytimes.com is same as the one with styled components and we are working on it (https://github.com/danny0838/webscrapbook/issues/109). It's a complicated issue as there are many things behind the scene to deal with. We almost have the solution but still need sometime to implement it, maybe next one or two revision.
I can't see an issue for washingtonpost.com, maybe it's really related with the scripts you've mentioned. Could you confirm it (by disabling your scripts and see if the issue's still there) and provide the scripts you are using, for further investigation?
The source page URL is recorded in the source code of the saved page but not shown directly. You'll be able to see it from the metadata if the backend server is used; otherwise you can see it from the source code. We are still investigating an appropriate way to present such metadata without altering the document too explictly.
As this addon site doesn't allow discussion, you can report issues to the source code repo (like the link provided above) so that we can discuss and trace them better:)
140 ulasan
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Ka, 3 bulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh superyngo, 4 bulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Alanyyab, 6 bulan yang laluVery useful. 2 Feature suggestions: Dark mode UI support for the sidebar. And an easier way to highlight text, possibly similar to Raindrop extension where after highlighting text a popup right above the text shows up with color options.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 18834571, 7 bulan yang laluУдалось в первозданном виде сохранить страницу, которую не сохранял ни один браузер. Автору большое спасибо и успехов в работе!
- Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh ehobby, 9 bulan yang laluUnable to get this to work on Firefox 133 and Fedora 40. Installed the backend and the browser extension. Could not find any configuration for the backend that would work. There needs to be a more specific set of instructions written by someone who has successfully installed this extension in Linux, unless this only works in Windows. Perhaps this is a great extension but it is worthless if it cannot be installed.
Balasan pengembang
dikirim 9 bulan yang laluHave you read the documentation: https://github.com/danny0838/webscrapbook/wiki/Basic#3-browser-sidebar-approach ? - Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh OM_RA, 10 bulan yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Silopolis, setahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 18235051, 2 tahun yang laluI needed to backup a website that used form login, making a simple scraping not possible. This extension worked like a charm after figuring out some of the configuration options.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Avater, 2 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 14643647, 2 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 4 dari 5oleh Supriyadi, 2 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Yaliang, 3 tahun yang laluThanks for developing this plugin. It makes it extremely easy to achieve and save web pages.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh texsd, 3 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 13058149, 3 tahun yang laluI choose the WebScrapBook/data option but it wants me to configure Backend server... ? ? ?
Useless.
I miss the old Scrapbook Extension.Balasan pengembang
dikirim 3 tahun yang laluPlease consult the documentation about different approaches to capture a page: https://github.com/danny0838/webscrapbook/wiki/Basic. Raise an issue with more details (e.g. a screenshot illustrating where you are asked for backend server configuration) in the source repository if you still don't get it. - Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Alexander, 3 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 12472805, 3 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Deil, 3 tahun yang laluSo glad .maff format is not dead. Thanks a lot.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh azzone, 3 tahun yang lalu
- Diberi peringkat 1 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 13474132, 4 tahun yang laluTanto utile prima ora completamente inusabile perchè oltremodo macchinoso.
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh mike1985, 4 tahun yang laluAmazing Tool, would be nice to set also a min. size for pictures...
- Diberi peringkat 5 dari 5oleh Pengguna Firefox 15902721, 4 tahun yang lalu