Critiques pour Wikiwand - knowledge, with context
Wikiwand - knowledge, with context par Wikiwand
671 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14131309 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansGot addicted. cannot use old wikipedia UI anymore
- Noté 5 sur 5par coldkeys, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par GSC Percentage Revealer, il y a 7 ansWikiwand was the greatest Wikipedia add-on ever. Now they totally screwed it up with the most intrusive, useless ads I've seen in a long time. If only they were even remotely related to the content at hand, but no, they're totally random and add no value at all. Also, they're seemingly immune to ad blockers, because as soon as you pick up the elements to block, the whole page UI gets messed up. Disgusting.
Guys, you need revenue? There are better ways, I'm sure.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansHi, thanks for the review. We appreciate your comment and so in the recent releases we added the ability to check if the user has an extension or not and so now if you have Firefox extension installed you will see no more ads. Regards - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13415230 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansRecently wikiland started showing intrusive ads. I wouldn't have minded an unintrusive ad but this is too much
Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansHi, thanks for the review. We appreciate your comment and so in the recent releases we added the ability to check if the user has an extension or not and so now if you have Firefox extension installed you will see no more ads. Regards - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14095747 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansI used to like you, Wikiwand. You could have been great. You could have been better than Wikipedia.
But no.
Now you show ads embedded straight in the source code so you bypass adblockers. As an added bonus, they break the page now. Hooray, killing two birds with one stone! Don't even bother blocking them with element hider because they're a hydra; cut off one head it grows another.
Did you piss off your investors? Revenue running on fumes? I'm sorry but you guys have lost my respect for selling out and aggressively pushing ads onto the end user. It's funny because Wikipedia stood against ads and you people decide to go against that, full steam ahead. I doubt that 30% goes to Wikipedia.
Straight to the trash it goes, like it belonged in the first place. It was too good to be true.
If the intrusivity was an honest mistake then I will eat my words. Until then, this review stays.Réponse du développeur
mis en ligne : il y a 7 ansHi, thanks for the review. We appreciate your comment and so in the recent releases we added the ability to check if the user has an extension or not and so now if you have Firefox extension installed you will see no more ads. Regards - Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14095588 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansAds?? Are you joking? Uninstalled. A pity, because the extension was pretty, but ads are an absolute no-go.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14095528 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansUninstalled the moment they put ads on Wikipedia. Sleazy and only 30% of their revenue goes to wikipedia. Completely shameless and I will never use your product again.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14095465 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansThis addon was pretty cool, but trying to make money off of Wikipedia articles with ads is sleazy. Uninstalled.
- Noté 1 sur 5par iheresss, il y a 7 ansAds on top of the page is too much. It was once my favourite extension, just sad to see it sell itself to ruin user experience.
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14094597 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansWikiwand used to be great, but now adds a line of shitty advertisement on top of wikipedia. Sad to see one my favorite wiki improvements turn to this :(
- Noté 5 sur 5par Speedflam, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Gabriel Alberto Quintana, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14057895 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansВикипедию стало приятнее читать
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14055303 de Firefox, il y a 7 ansI can't go back to the old Wikipedia ever again. This extension breathes new life into an old standard, making it both gorgeous and far more user friendly. Seriously, try it.
- Noté 5 sur 5par 513m4n1609, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par Pranav Rai, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 14040577 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13809335 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Atrazine, il y a 7 ansBeautifully and neatly transforms Wikipedia articles on-the-fly from its legacy appearance and handling into 21st century look-and-feel, including some customizable visual settings (like serif and sans letterforms and a dark theme!) and great easy-access features like:
- Access less often used Wikipedia tools, such as editing, history and discussion pages, in the menu bar (the legacy Wikipedia site is opened in a separate tab).
- Easily switch the displayed language of an article if it is available in any of your preferred languages.
- Tap CTRL twice to toggle the search field for additional Wikipedia material.
- Mouse-over a link to another article to not only display a pop-up window intro of the article, but also to open the article in another tab (without having to hold down a key). - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13811586 de Firefox, il y a 7 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par hide0312, il y a 7 ans