Critiques pour Disconnect
Disconnect par Disconnect
519 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Imp Mischievous, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13832816 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13801775 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par lukasz wasylewicz, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 11640498 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansThe "content" option should be blocked by default!
If an user found that it breaks websites, then he might have the option to unblock "content".
It is a shame to force all users to behave as soft-users. You are downgrading users to the same low level.
Also, if you don't block "content" by default, then why do you count "content" as blocked?
It should not appear at the counter in the icon.
It is a shame (if not a scum) to do that.
And worst, if an user blocks "content", why the add-on doesn't remember/respect user' choice after browser restarting?
Why users must block same "content" at every session?
... just crazy!... so mediocre!
And you are hearing from us users, the same complains every year... and nothing, zero changes, zero improvements.
You deserve zero stars due to your blindness along so many years. - Noté 2 sur 5par Puls3, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par madalin99, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Damrongrit Klangthanu, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13570215 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Marianne, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par TrickyPR, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 4 sur 5par cvegax, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13666733 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansThe license for this add-on is falsely stated here as GNU GPL 3.0. This add-on in fact also includes two proprietary (non-free, not open source) third-party software products, as stated on the add-on's github page (https://github.com/disconnectme/disconnect). Claiming that the add-on is free software and licensed exclusively under GNU GPL 3.0 is highly deceptive, dishonest and inaccurate. Please rectify this and include the licenses of all software parts of the add-on on its official Mozilla Firefox add-ons page.
I've now reported this issue to the authors, to [email protected], via the form on its AMO page and on Mozilla's forum (https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/information-about-add-on-stated-incorrectly-by-authors-on-amo/23377). All with no effect, the mistake remains. Apparently any add-on developer can just claim anything they want about their add-on, there is no control. It's good to be aware that addons.vaultpit.io can't be trusted and doesn't really care to provide accurate information about add-ons. - Noté 5 sur 5par ItzDidoko, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12315658 de Firefox, il y a 8 ansvery very thanks for this plugin. that's awesome.please upgrade to be better. thank you
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 12933059 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 1 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 13605184 de Firefox, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 5 sur 5par NightlyBlazer, il y a 8 ans
- Noté 2 sur 5par fireside, il y a 8 ansThis blocks embedded Twitter images from showing on many web pages, such as on Huffington Post pages. And there is no option to change that, other than disabling Disconnect. And I am not sure this addon is needed anymore since Adblock Plus also has options to block tracking. And their options don't block embedded Twitter images from showing on pages.