199 notes
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18878221 de Firefox, il y a 5 mois
- Noté 2 sur 5par Carol A, il y a 5 moisOnly works with SWF files. There are sites like ColourLovers.com's pattern generator that use flashplayer for things other than playing flash. Please make the extension also able to handle PNG, BMP, JPG, etc., for generating seamless repeating backgrounds. Thank you! As soon as this happens, 5 stars from me! I'm desperate for this tool!
- Noté 5 sur 5par DaisyLavender, il y a 6 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Cherrychon, il y a 6 moisExcellent if you often browse IBs or even ego raptors website... I forgot what it's called
- Noté 5 sur 5par Sunny, il y a 7 moisI'm so glad I can play some of the old Neopets games, however this extension is a work in progress.
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18867758 de Firefox, il y a 7 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par regauss, il y a 8 moisThey claim to be fixing text and other issues but I've held back on reporting 2 swfs, and only the reported swfs get fixed. I still can see the problem. they're making hacks to fix a person's problems, but not the overall system. their fixes only fix the one swf, not all swfs with the issue. because I'm not reporting it, its not even going to be fixed for the game even by way of another game with the issue being fixed
and when they go to close any issue, no matter the content, they close it without even asking if the problem is fixed for the person that opened the issue! the maintainers just go 'works on my machine" "fixed by 12345" and close the issue.
sloppy.
you can just do a 'does it work now?'
and if the user threw their phone into the lake after 2-3 days close the issue and be done. say 'if you see the problem, reopen'
is it really that hard waiting for feedback from someone active in the issue? or even just asking, active or not?
don't just insta close assuming you've fixed it for everyone, at least wait a little before assuming no response.
might as well have one of the dreaded and awful stalebots if you're that uninterested in following up - Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18616882 de Firefox, il y a 8 moisNot available anymore? Install attempts on Ubuntu Flagging "corrupt ad-on" instead.....
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18809209 de Firefox, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par northpark, il y a 8 mois
- Noté 4 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18772871 de Firefox, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 2 sur 5par North Star, il y a 9 moisExtension integration of Ruffle with Firefox is evidently well done. Tasking Ruffle to run my case study of stubborn Flash has yet to work, unfortunately.
This past March when I contacted the sup. team, and cited the problem web page, I got crickets and this remains the case.
The Ruffle ext. for WinPC likewise could not render the p. From bits I've read re. Ruffle, albeit capable, it's in no form a panacea to run all Flash content. - Noté 2 sur 5par ballism32, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par LoveBuhn, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par BeeVampirePig, il y a 9 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par KoolUser, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par Utilisateur ou utilisatrice 18577797 de Firefox, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par おみそ, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par LaShane, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 5 sur 5par richard, il y a 10 mois
- Noté 1 sur 5par Mitchell, il y a un anThe website just says that the web browser does not support Flash.
- Noté 5 sur 5par ZT, il y a un an
- Noté 5 sur 5par Simmer, il y a un an