Bewertungen für Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube)
Improve YouTube! (Open-Source for YouTube) von code-for-charity, ImprovedTube
776 Bewertungen
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Hrodvitnir, vor 2 TagenI'm a big fan of this, but I did come here to mention/ask about the hiding the shorts reels/forcing normal player not working - but I see someone said it's on mobile specifically. I have zero understanding of coding or how to use github except following specific instructions, so wouldn't have a clue how I could add the mobile URL if that other person didn't.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 11 Stundenhi :) (then consider to not down-vote hat you like? :D) a point of open source is one volunteer (or one commercial company) wont be enough / best for millions of users and 1000s of use-cases. You guys can really copy paste the mobile URL from the browser bar. (Or even search for the desktop URL in the code, to add it there as synonym (=Code contribution) And at doubt just ask, chatgpt and or on github, and so on. - Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19438257, vor 2 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Yevhen Tretiakov, vor 5 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon stapuft, vor 10 TagenWorks allright, but on mobile, you have tonswitch to "desktop mode" to make some features work, like automatically redirecting from the shitty "shorts" page to the actual YouTube page for the video.
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 5 TagenHi! Please add the mobile URL in our github repo if you will. This is made for www.youtube since 2012 (and www.youtube changes alone required a lot of volunteering). The descriptions sais "... (+preparing mobile m.youtube)". (Please give fair feedback. We could flag it as "Misplaced bug report or support request", but prefer to keep information visible.) - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon PP, vor 12 TagenSeems to work for me. Haven't come across any issues for my uses
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Lakyn, vor 13 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon MetalGear89, vor 13 TagenFantastic add one. Youtube is awful to use on desktop without it.
- Bewertet mit 2 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19465923, vor 17 TagenThemes and some settings are ok. I just do not like that whenever I switch from a tab to youtube and vice versa, there is a short amount of time where the page reloads. I have no idea why it keeps doing this. It also has issues wherein despite not enabling the "Force videos to start from the beginning", it still forces videos to start from the beginning. It's annoying and worth the uninstall. Hopefully they fix such issues by then
Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 5 Tagenhi! youtube changing is not an issue we share every day. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 18989911, vor 17 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 3 von 5 Sternenvon ueeu, vor 21 TagenVery good QQL feature add, however it is extremely performance intensive, do NOT use the build in theme feature 100% will slow down site responsiveness.
Also it would be nice to add a action menu because the YouTube ui keep changing so I can stop seeing buggy UI
Edit: CPU usage wise I think so, but it seems to also interfere with page loading, most of the time for me it's a blank pageAntwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor 5 TagenYou mean full replacement UI?
There currently is a CPU hungry bug only for the moment while you are changing our settings and only in Firefox. - Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Vangxim, vor 24 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon SzymonL, vor 24 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 17491097, vor 25 Tagen
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Carriercarry, vor einem MonatHide ugly ai and auto-dubbed. thank you!
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Cboom, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Ivia Relle, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Hoàng Hải Hậu, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 4 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 16779275, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon coldcoffee, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 5 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19298834, vor einem MonatMakes YouTube usable again!
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon DOT, vor einem Monat
- Bewertet mit 1 von 5 Sternenvon Firefox-Benutzer 19242234, vor einem MonatThis addon claims there are filter rules. There are no filter rules that I could see. Searching the menu for "filter" reveals nothing. At best, you can "block" channels and videos, a feature youtube already has.
Also, installing this caused all of my firefox tabs on youtube to stop responding, forcing me to close and reopen each.
It's weird to me how strongly they are marketing this addon, too, and the uninstall page vaguely tries to guilt trip you for removing the plugin. I realize this is recommended by mozilla, but it's tripping a lot of sus metrics for me, and I can't recommend it.
Edit: Further review of the developer's responses on low scoring reviews make me even more certain this isn't a good idea. 1) The developers respond to claims the plugin slows users' browser down with "nuh uh no it doesn't" and "yeah well why don't you measure the milliseconds with dev tools?", and 2) The devs claim that voting less than 5 stars is "voting against the project". Why does that matter? Why does your score on your open source, free project matter? It's almost like you're pushing for popularity on your plugin for some other reason. It's incredibly suspicious, and that type of language is couched in incredibly manipulative undertones. *Don't install this.* This thing is full of red flags.Antwort des Entwicklers
geschrieben am vor einem MonatHi, the word filter applies to our many layout and display:none features. However content-filtering can be the biggest roadmap item since we have not implemented or been asked, most of it. You can read up on it here https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22Filtering%20%26%20Discovery%20(of%20Content)%22 )(half of which remains monologues with no user participation) https://github.com/MarcGuiselin/youtube-refined did some, yet only found about 1000 users then. Recently our new "competitor" Untrap has some too i think and is surprisingly the most / only likely developer to be reading our repo and roadmap. (If you can, suggest them not to collab / not reinvent this difficult task https://github.com/code-charity/youtube/discussions/1881). You can give fair feedback and you might not want to frustrate volunteers. We could also flag this ("Misplaced bug report or support request"), but prefer to keep information visible. There is no marketing budget and usually that would leave traces. When driven by suspicion, you might have more fun /success examining code. (You could enhance global security scanners or run your own).